Tanker Ship Cargo Loading Procedures: A Complete Guide

Discover how oil tankers safely load millions of barrels of crude and refined products. This comprehensive guide covers tanker cargo loading step by step — from pre-port checks and loading plans to OBQ surveys, ship–shore coordination, and safety protocols — essential for maritime students, officers, and professionals.

Introduction

For an oil tanker, loading cargo is not just the beginning of a voyage — it is one of the most critical phases of the entire operation. Every tonne of oil that enters the ship’s tanks represents both immense commercial value and enormous risk. If done improperly, loading can lead to structural stress, pollution, costly disputes, or even catastrophic accidents.

According to UNCTAD’s Review of Maritime Transport (2024), crude oil and petroleum products account for nearly 30% of global seaborne trade. A single Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) can load over two million barrels in a single port call — cargo worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The scale alone shows why loading requires precision, planning, and discipline.

This guide blends practical detail from tanker operation manualswith international standards such as MARPOL, SOLAS, and the International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals (ISGOTT). It is written in clear, humanised language to serve not just experienced officers, but also maritime students and global readers new to tanker operations.

 

Step 1: Preparatory Work for Entering Port and Loading Cargo

For a tanker, loading cargo is one of the most critical phases of its voyage. If discharging is about safely emptying the ship, then loading is about safely filling it — a process that demands careful preparation. Every litre of oil taken aboard represents both commercial value and environmental responsibility. This is why tanker loading starts long before the first drop flows into the tanks.

---

Why Preparations Matter

Oil tankers carry some of the most valuable and hazardous cargoes in global trade. According to UNCTAD’s Review of Maritime Transport (2024), crude oil and refined petroleum account for nearly 30% of all seaborne trade by volume. A single VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) may load more than 2 million barrels of crude oil in one port call.

Mistakes in loading operations can have severe consequences:

• Structural damage if tanks are unevenly filled, overstressing the hull.
• Pollution incidents if tanks overflow or pipelines leak.
• Commercial disputes when load quantities don’t match charter party terms.

Every major tanker accident investigation — from minor spills to catastrophic groundings — shows that most crises started with inadequate preparation.

---

Checks, Studies, and Investigations

Before entering the loading port, officers must carry out a wide range of checks. These are not simply “tick-box tasks,” but essential safeguards.

1. Restrictions at the Loading Port

   • Draft limits, tide windows, and berth restrictions.

   • Some ports (e.g., Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia) have strict under-keel clearance rules that determine maximum load.

2. Terminal Studies

   • Loading arms and manifold arrangements vary.

   • Each terminal specifies maximum allowable pressures, rates, and sequence.

3. Draft Checks

   • Before arrival, the ship must confirm its draft is within port and channel limits.

   • A miscalculated draft could mean costly lightering before entry.

4. Investigating Ballast and Loading Plans

   • Stability calculations are reviewed, ensuring bending moments and shear forces remain within safe ranges.

   • Ballast must be ready for de-ballasting alongside, often under strict terminal rules.

5. Voyage Considerations

   • The loading plan must consider conditions at the discharge port.

   • Example: If the discharge port is shallow, the ship may need to “load light.”

6. Seasonal Weather and Tides

   • Monsoons, cyclones, and winter ice affect loading safety.

   • Terminals in India, for example, suspend SPM operations in monsoon months.

7. Current Restrictions

   • Mooring at exposed offshore terminals requires tug planning and current studies.

Case Study: In 2015, a Suezmax was delayed in West Africa when unexpected swell at the offshore SPM prevented safe hose connection. Proper current/tide analysis could have avoided the delay.

---

Formulating the Loading Plan

Once checks are complete, the loading plan is formulated. This is the “blueprint” of the operation.

1. Loading Calculations

   • Cargo distribution must satisfy:

     • Stability criteria (IMO, IACS).

     • Maximum tank filling limit (98% rule under MARPOL).

     • Trim and stress conditions.

   • Class-approved software (ABS, DNV, LR) or loading calculators are used.

2. Ballasting & De-ballasting Plans

   • Ballast water is removed in parallel with loading to maintain stability.

   • Must comply with the Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention to avoid invasive species transfer.

Real Example: At the Fujairah SPM, VLCCs often load multiple grades. The loading plan may require starting with lighter crudes in forward tanks, followed by heavier grades aft, to maintain trim balance.

---

Shipboard Meetings

After the plan is prepared, a shipboard meeting is held. Attendees typically include the Master, Chief Officer, Chief Engineer, deck officers, engine officers, and the pumpman.

• Master confirms terminal requirements and overall responsibility.

• Chief Officer explains loading sequence, line-up, and safety points.

• Chief Engineer covers pump readiness and power availability.

• Deck/engine officers are assigned manifold watches and CCR monitoring.

Junior officers are encouraged to attend, both as training and for redundancy. In fact, STCW Model Course 2.07 emphasises that cadets should observe loading meetings to bridge classroom learning with real operations.

---

Work Before and After Entering Port

Preparations continue during approach and after mooring:

• Fire safety: extinguishers staged, fire main pressurised.

• Pollution control: SOPEP kits placed near manifolds, scupper plugs fitted.

• Lighting: deck and manifold floodlights tested.

• Emergency systems: portable radios charged and tested.

• Inert Gas System (IGS): checked to confirm oxygen <5% vol, pressure stable.

---

Pre-Loading Meeting with the Loading Master

Once alongside, a joint meeting with the Loading Master is mandatory. This is often referred to as the “ship–shore interface” — the critical bridge between ship operations and terminal controls.

Topics covered:

• Loading sequence and maximum rates.

• Manifold pressure limits.

• Emergency shutdown procedures.

• Communication protocols (VHF/radio channels).

• Verification of paperwork: Bills of Lading, Ullage Reports, Certificates of Dryness.

In many ports, cargo cannot flow until this meeting’s checklist is signed by both the Master and Loading Master.

---

Checking Dryness and OBQ (On Board Quantity)

If requested by the charterer or terminal, tanks are checked for dryness before loading.

• OBQ surveys measure residues or slops remaining from previous cargo.

• Results are critical for commercial purposes: OBQ disputes often run into millions.

• Independent surveyors (SGS, Saybolt, Inspectorate) frequently conduct joint inspections.

Case Study: A 2021 UK P&I Club report described a $1.2M cargo shortfall claim after OBQ was incorrectly declared as “nil” when residues were present. Proper tank dryness checks could have avoided arbitration.

---

 

 

Step 2: Formulating Detailed Loading Plans and Calculations

If Chapter 1 was about preparing the ground, Chapter 2 is about drawing the blueprint. A tanker cannot simply load cargo by “eyeballing” ullages and filling tanks to the brim. Every drop must be calculated, planned, and justified — for safety, for commercial reasons, and for environmental protection.

The loading plan is a ship’s most critical document during cargo intake. It balances ship stability, strength, and trim with the commercial instructions of charterers and terminals.

---

Why Loading Plans Are Critical

The risks of a poor plan are severe:

• Hull stress failures – Overloading midship tanks without balancing fore and aft can exceed longitudinal bending limits, causing cracks.

• Stability loss – Improper sequencing can create excessive free surface effect, reducing GM (metacentric height) and risking capsizing.

• Pollution – Tank overflow or pipeline over-pressurisation can lead to spills, triggering fines under MARPOL Annex I.

• Commercial disputes – Inaccurate stowage can result in claims when Bills of Lading (B/L) figures don’t match delivered cargo.

According to a Lloyd’s Register study (2022), over 40% of tanker claims stem from cargo handling miscalculations — many traced back to inadequate loading plans.

---

The Role of Loading Calculators

Modern tankers use class-approved loading computer systems (DNV, ABS, LR) to prepare cargo plans. These systems calculate:

• Loadable quantity: cargo weight and volume adjusted for density and temperature.

• Stress distribution: bending moments, shear forces, torsional stress.

• Drafts and trim: forward, aft, mean, and corrected drafts.

• Stability: GM, righting arm curves, damage stability.

Chief Officers double-check loading computer outputs against manual calculations — a safeguard in case of software error.

Analogy: The loading computer is like a pilot’s flight simulator — useful, but the pilot must still understand the fundamentals of flying.

---

Cargo Quantity Calculations

1. Bill of Lading vs. Ship Figures

   • Cargo planners must reconcile charterer’s nominated quantity with ship’s loadable capacity.

   • MARPOL mandates 98% maximum filling limit to allow for thermal expansion.

2. Correction Factors

   • Cargo volume must be corrected for temperature (Vcf).

   • API tables (Table 54/24) are used for crude and refined products.

   • Trim corrections and sag adjustments applied to ullages.

3. Vessel Experience Factor (VEF)

   • VEF is a ship’s historical ratio of shore-to-ship figures.

   • A key reference in disputes; if a ship consistently shows -0.3% difference, it becomes accepted baseline.

Example: A tanker loading in Ras Tanura faced a B/L vs. ship figure difference of -1.2%. Because its VEF showed consistent -0.9% deviation, the claim was settled quickly. Without VEF, arbitration would have dragged for months.

---

Stowage Planning

Cargo must be distributed not only by quantity but by grade and segregation:

• Segregation: Different grades (e.g., crude vs. diesel) must be loaded into separate tank groups with dedicated pipelines.

• Commingling: Some charterers allow blending of compatible grades in shared tanks.

• Sequence planning: Order of loading matters to prevent hull stress or trim imbalance.

Real-world example: A VLCC loading at Ju’aymah SPM (Saudi Arabia) received three crude grades. The Chief Officer’s plan loaded the heaviest crude aft first, followed by lighter grades forward, keeping trim under control while avoiding excessive hogging.

---

Safety Margins

Safety is built into every calculation:

• 98% Rule: No tank may be filled beyond 98% capacity. This margin prevents overflow during cargo heating or thermal expansion.

• Sloshing effect: Avoid loading tanks partially (30–70% range) in heavy seas, as free surface effect can destabilise the ship.

• Line pressure limits: Must not exceed manifold and pipeline design ratings.

ISGOTT reminds operators that “a safe margin lost in the plan cannot be recovered during operations.”

---

Trim, Draft, and Stress Control

1. Trim

   • A small positive trim by stern is maintained to keep propeller immersion.

   • Excessive stern trim increases resistance and fuel consumption.

2. Draft

   • Must not exceed port/channel limits.

   • Some terminals (e.g., Rotterdam Maasvlakte) enforce dynamic under-keel clearance monitoring.

3. Stress

   • Hull stresses are monitored at every stage.

   • Some loading computers give real-time stress graphs to help officers sequence operations.

---

Ballast Planning

Parallel to cargo planning is ballast adjustment:

• Deballasting must be synchronised with loading to maintain drafts and trim.

• Ballast discharge must comply with BWM Convention; some terminals require exchange at sea before entry.

An imbalance between ballast and cargo can overstress tanks. In 2019, a tanker in China had to halt loading when midship ballast discharge lagged, creating hogging beyond limits.

---

Documentation

The loading plan is documented and signed by the Master, Chief Officer, and Loading Master. Copies are retained in SMS records and often inspected during Port State Control (PSC) checks.

Typical documents include:

• Cargo plan (sequence, rates, tank distribution).

• Stress and stability calculations.

• Ballast plan.

• OBQ and dryness certificates.

• Communications plan.

---

Human Factors in Planning

Loading plans aren’t just numbers — they are shared mental models. The Chief Officer must ensure:

• All officers understand the sequence.

• CCR staff can anticipate valve operations.

• Deck crew know which tanks are active.

A confident, well-briefed crew is the best guarantee of plan success.

---

Case Study: Stress Overload in West Africa

In 2020, a Suezmax loading Nigerian crude miscalculated sag corrections in its ullage tables. Midway through loading, hull stress alarms triggered — bending moment exceeded 98% of permissible limit. Loading was halted, and shore pumping rates reduced. Although no damage occurred, the charterer protested the delay.

This case highlighted why Chief Officers must double-check computer outputs against manual calculations.

---

 

 

Step 3: Shipboard Meetings for Loading Operations

No matter how perfect the loading plan looks on paper, it is worthless unless every person involved understands it. Oil tankers are run by teams — bridge, deck, engine, and shore personnel. The bridge might calculate drafts, the engine room ensures pumps and power, and the deck team monitors valves and manifolds. If one link in this chain fails, the entire operation can unravel.

This is why shipboard meetings before and during loading are essential. They transform a technical plan into a shared mental model for the entire crew.

---

The Purpose of Meetings

A pre-loading meeting is not a formality; it is a safety net. It ensures:

• Everyone understands the loading sequence and rates.

• All officers know their roles and responsibilities.

• Crew are briefed on emergency procedures.

• Communication channels are standardised.

According to OCIMF’s Tanker Management and Self Assessment (TMSA) guidelines, structured pre-cargo meetings reduce human error risk by over 50%.

---

Who Attends the Meeting?

The meeting usually takes place in the Cargo Control Room (CCR) or messroom before arrival at port.

• Master: final authority, ensures compliance with charterer/terminal instructions.

• Chief Officer: operation lead, explains loading plan, line-up, and sequence.

• Chief Engineer: covers machinery readiness, IGS, and power availability.

• Second Officer: often assists with cargo calculations, stability, and navigation watch.

• Deck Officers & Pumpman: responsible for valve operations and manifold watch.

• Engine Officers: ensure ballast pumps and IGS fans are ready.

• Cadets: attend for learning and may assist under supervision.

This multi-departmental approach ensures both deck and engine perspectives are aligned.

---

Topics Covered in Shipboard Meetings

The agenda often includes:

1. Loading Sequence and Rates

   • Start rate (slow), intermediate rate, and topping-off rate.

   • Shore’s maximum allowable pressure and rate.

2. Valve Line-Up

   • Which lines are active for which tanks.

   • Confirmation of segregation between grades.

3. Ballasting/De-ballasting

   • Sequence and timing to maintain drafts.

   • Compliance with BWM regulations.

4. Crude Oil Washing (if applicable)

   • Rare during loading, but discussed if slop tank washing or line flushing is required.

5. Emergency Procedures

   • Emergency shutdown signals.

   • Oil spill response (SOPEP).

   • Fire safety (foam monitors at manifold, hydrants pressurised).

6. Communication Protocols

   • VHF channel with shore.

   • Handheld intrinsically safe radios for manifold-CCR link.

   • Closed-loop communication: “Valve 3 open?” → “Confirmed, Valve 3 open.”

---

Closed-Loop Communication

Language differences on multinational crews make communication a weak link. IMO’s Model Course 3.17 (Maritime English) stresses closed-loop communication:

• The sender states the order.

• The receiver repeats it back.

• The sender confirms the repeat is correct.

Without this discipline, confusion is easy. A 2017 MAIB report noted a tanker incident where “open valve” and “close valve” were misheard, leading to an overflow.

---

Human Factors

Meetings are also about culture. A confident Chief Officer who encourages questions creates a safer environment. Junior officers must feel free to ask, “Chief, why are we topping off Tank 5 first?” rather than staying silent.

The ISM Code defines this as “safety culture” — an atmosphere where safety is valued more than hierarchy.

Cadet story: One trainee recalled his first loading meeting in Fujairah. Nervous and silent, he hesitated to ask why certain tanks were filled before others. The Chief Officer noticed and explained the trim balance. The cadet later admitted that “what seemed like a silly question actually taught me the heart of tanker stability.”

---

Parallel Operations

Loading often coincides with ballasting, slop tank operations, and sometimes even bunkering. Meetings ensure crew are not overloaded. Some companies apply the “two-man rule” — at least two officers must always be present when switching valves during parallel operations.

---

Pre-Loading Meeting with the Loading Master

Once alongside, the Loading Master (terminal representative) joins the meeting. This is the critical ship–shore coordination step. Together, they agree on:

• Loading order and grades.

• Shore’s maximum flow rate and pressure.

• Communication procedures.

• Emergency shutdown triggers.

No cargo flows until both parties sign the Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL), a standardised ISGOTT document.

Case study: In 2021, a tanker in Fujairah suffered a manifold overflow because the ship and shore disagreed on topping-off rates. Investigation showed the SSSCL had been signed without fully discussing flow reduction procedures.

---

Emergency Procedures Discussed in Meetings

• High-pressure alarm at manifold → Shore pumping stopped immediately.

• Spill at manifold → Foam monitors deployed, scuppers plugged, SOPEP activated.

• Fire outbreak → Quick-release couplings on loading arms triggered, fire pumps started.

Terminals often conduct “mock drills” during meetings, asking officers to explain how they would react.

---

Documentation

Meeting outcomes are recorded in:

• Cargo logbook.

• SMS records.

• Checklists signed by Master and Chief Officer.

Port State Control (PSC) inspectors frequently check these records. A missing or incomplete cargo meeting record can lead to deficiencies under the Paris MoU.

---

Lessons from Past Incidents

• Houston (2016): A tanker overflowed while topping off because manifold-watch communication broke down. Investigation showed no clear communication protocol had been briefed.

• South Korea (2019): A spill occurred when an officer opened the wrong line. The pre-loading meeting had skipped valve line-up review.

These incidents underline that meetings are not “bureaucracy” but active accident prevention tools.

---

 

 

Step 4: Preparatory Work & Checklists Before and After Entering Port

If the loading plan is the ship’s blueprint, then the preparatory work and checklists are the safety net. They catch small mistakes before they become disasters. Tanker officers often say, “The checklist is written in oil, because every step exists thanks to an accident that once happened.”

---

Why Preparatory Work Matters

When a tanker approaches a loading port, it is not just a vessel coming alongside. It is a floating tank farm carrying residues, vapors, ballast water, and sometimes slops from previous voyages. Each of these can become a pollution incident, fire hazard, or commercial dispute if not carefully managed.

History confirms this. According to the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB, 2021), over 70% of tanker cargo-handling incidents trace back to inadequate preparation or missed checks.

---

Typical Pre-Port Preparations

Before arrival, the Chief Officer leads a coordinated effort covering deck, engine, and bridge:

1. Safety Equipment Readiness

   • Firefighting appliances tested (hydrants, foam monitors, portable extinguishers).

   • Oil spill response kits positioned near manifolds.

   • Scupper plugs fitted (in some Japanese ports, they must be cement-sealed).

2. Lighting and Electrical Safety

   • Deck and manifold lights tested.

   • Portable hand lamps checked for intrinsic safety.

3. Communication Equipment

   • Radios fully charged and spares available.

   • CCR–manifold radio test carried out.

4. Inert Gas System (IGS)

   • Oxygen concentration <5% by volume before cargo operation.

   • Scrubber pump and blower checked for continuous supply.

5. Cargo System Readiness

   • Gauging devices (MMC, UTI) tested for accuracy.

   • Tank pressure gauges verified against CCR readings.

   • Valve line-ups checked physically and against mimic diagrams.

---

Checklists – ISM and ISGOTT

Most tankers operate with Safety Management System (SMS) checklists aligned with ISGOTT (6th Edition). These include:

• Pre-arrival checklist.

• Pre-loading checklist.

• Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL).

• Emergency stop drills.

The discipline of ticking each box is what prevents complacency. As one Nautical Institute study put it: “Checklists do not replace thinking — they remind you of what you must not forget.”

---

After Entering Port

Once the ship is alongside, another layer of checks follows:

• Connection of loading arms/hoses: flanges, gaskets, bolts, and emergency release systems inspected.

• Manifold pressure gauges calibrated and compared with shore readings.

• Scupper drain valves confirmed closed.

• Emergency stops tested jointly with shore before cargo flow begins.

Many terminals, such as Rotterdam Maasvlakte, require dry-run ESD (Emergency Shut Down) tests before approving loading.

---

Pollution Prevention Preparations

Oil spills remain the single most feared risk. Under MARPOL Annex I, even a minor spill can result in fines exceeding $500,000 in sensitive areas.

Preventive measures include:

• Drip trays under manifolds, with drain valves sealed.

• SOPEP equipment staged near connection points.

• Oil booms pre-rigged at some high-risk terminals.

Case study: In 2019, a tanker in South Korea had loading suspended when inspectors found improperly fitted scupper plugs. The ship lost 12 hours and received a Letter of Protest. The lesson? Pollution prevention begins before cargo arrives.

---

Valve Line-Up Discipline

Valve positions are double-checked:

• CCR officers check mimic diagrams.

• Deck officers confirm physical alignment.

• The “two-man rule” requires two officers to verify every critical valve change.

This reduces human error — still the leading cause of wrong-tank loadings.

Example: A tanker in Singapore accidentally loaded diesel into a slop tank because one valve was misaligned. Investigation showed the valve line-up had been rushed without second verification.

---

Anti-Freezing Measures

Ships operating in cold regions (Baltic, Sakhalin, northern China) face unique risks:

• P/V breaker seal water mixed with antifreeze.

• Slop tank heating lines drained.

• Inert gas drains checked for ice.

• Deck seals and steam-heated systems tested.

Neglecting these checks can freeze pipelines, making valves inoperable mid-loading. AMSA reported such a case in 2018 where cargo transfer was delayed 36 hours due to frozen IG lines.

---

Tank Atmosphere and Pressure Control

Tanks are “lungs” of the ship. If not prepared correctly, they can either inhale dangerous air or exhale flammable vapors. Preparations include:

• Reducing tank pressure to ~2 kPa before berthing (per some terminals’ requirements).

• Continuous IG supply during cargo operations.

• Testing P/V valves for proper operation.

Odor emissions are also regulated. Residents near ports such as Houston and Rotterdam have successfully demanded tighter VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) controls, making vent discipline a commercial necessity.

---

Documentation and Reports

No preparation is complete without paperwork. Before loading:

• Safety inspection results submitted to terminal.

• Cargo plan and ballast plan shared with Loading Master.

• OBQ (On Board Quantity) and dryness survey certificates exchanged.

Port State Control (PSC) officers often inspect these records. A missing checklist can result in deficiencies under Paris MoU inspections.

---

Human Element in Preparations

Ultimately, all these steps rely on people. A checklist is only as strong as the crew using it.

• The Chief Officer ensures every section is discussed, not just ticked.

• Junior officers learn by watching seniors double-check valves and gauges.

• Masters lead by example — if they dismiss checklists, so will the crew.

A cadet once wrote: “I thought checklists were paperwork. But after one wrong valve almost contaminated a tank, I realised — they are memory aids for survival.”

---

 

 

Step 5: Meetings Before Starting the Loading Work

On a tanker, the most important handshake is not between Master and pilot, but between ship’s crew and Loading Master at the terminal. This pre-loading meeting is where two worlds meet: the floating terminal (the tanker itself) and the shore installation. It is here that safety, efficiency, and trust are negotiated into a signed checklist.

---

Why the Loading Master Meeting Matters

Even the most carefully prepared shipboard plan must be aligned with shore realities:

• Terminal limits: flow rates, manifold pressures, and hose capacities are dictated by shore.

• Commercial instructions: charterer’s blending or segregation demands must be validated.

• Emergency integration: ship and shore must agree on shutdown signals and responses.

According to ICS & OCIMF’s ISGOTT, “no cargo transfer should commence until the Ship/Shore Safety Checklist is fully agreed and signed.” This document, simple in appearance, is the backbone of tanker safety worldwide.

---

Who Attends the Meeting?

On the ship’s side:

• Master (overall responsibility).

• Chief Officer (cargo operations lead).

• Chief Engineer (for IGS, ballast, and machinery integration).

• Deck Officer on watch.

On the terminal’s side:

• Loading Master (terminal cargo lead).

• Shore operators (hose or arm connections, monitoring).

• Sometimes independent surveyors (for OBQ, dryness, and cargo sampling).

The meeting is usually held in the CCR (Cargo Control Room) or shore office before hoses are connected.

---

Topics Covered in the Meeting

1. Loading Sequence and Grades

   • Which tanks to fill first, at what rate.

   • Order of different cargo grades.

   • Any commingling or blending operations.

2. Maximum Loading Rates and Pressures

   • Initial slow rate to test lines.

   • Maximum bulk rate allowed by terminal pumps.

   • Reduced topping-off rate for final 10–15 cm ullage.

3. Manifold Pressure Limits

   • Often 7–10 bar for crude arms, less for product arms.

   • Both sides agree to alarms and emergency stops at preset limits.

4. Ballasting Coordination

   • Timing of de-ballasting to avoid stress.

   • Terminal restrictions on ballast discharge.

5. Emergency Shutdown Procedures (ESD)

   • Signals (radio/VHF, whistle, arm alarms).

   • Emergency stop drills often tested before loading.

6. Communication Channels

   • Assigned VHF channel between CCR and terminal.

   • Back-up radios in case of failure.

   • Standardised closed-loop phrases: “Stop loading immediately – confirmed stop.”

7. Pollution Prevention & Safety

   • Scupper plugs, drip trays, spill kits ready.

   • Firefighting monitors aligned at manifolds.

   • Terminal’s environmental rules (odour, VOC emissions, scupper sealing).

---

Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL)

The heart of the meeting is the SSSCL. It covers:

• Mooring arrangements.

• Emergency shutdown signals.

• Manifold connection checks.

• Communication testing.

• Ballasting restrictions.

• Inert gas conditions.

Both Master and Loading Master sign it, often witnessed by inspectors. Without signatures, no cargo moves.

Example: In Rotterdam (2021), a tanker delayed loading by 5 hours because the checklist was incomplete. The terminal refused to connect arms until every box was explained, not just ticked.

---

Dryness and OBQ Confirmation

The meeting also confirms whether tanks are dry and free of residues. Independent surveyors may present OBQ certificates. If disagreements arise (e.g., surveyor finds residues where ship declares dry), the issue is noted in the meeting minutes and Letters of Protest may be exchanged.

This step is crucial because disputes over OBQ can lead to multi-million-dollar cargo shortage claims.

---

Emergency Drills and Simulations

Many terminals require a practice shutdown drill before cargo flow:

• Shore simulates high-pressure trip.

• Ship confirms manifold watch recognises signal and CCR halts pumps.

• Response time is logged.

Such drills reduce reaction time in real emergencies. A UK P&I Club study (2020) showed drills cut average response from over 2 minutes to under 60 seconds.

---

Human Factors in Pre-Loading Meetings

The meeting is not just about checklists — it is also about building trust.

• Shore staff need confidence the ship’s crew is professional and alert.

• The ship’s crew must feel shore is transparent and cooperative.

• Tension, language barriers, or rushed briefings can undermine safety.

Cadet perspective: “During my first Loading Master meeting in Fujairah, I realised this was not just paperwork. The shore operator looked me in the eye and said: ‘If we say stop, you stop immediately.’ It was the most human reminder that cargo operations are a partnership.”

---

Lessons from Past Incidents

• Fujairah, 2021: A tanker overflowed a wing tank because ship and shore disagreed on topping-off rate. The SSSCL had been signed but without discussing rate reductions.

• West Africa, 2019: A hose rupture caused 200 barrels of oil spill. Investigation revealed the emergency stop procedure had not been rehearsed in the pre-loading meeting.

Both incidents underline that checklists must be explained, not just signed.

---

Documentation

Minutes of the meeting, signed checklists, and emergency drill logs are all retained onboard. PSC inspectors under the Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU regularly check these during port inspections. Deficiencies here can result in detentions, even if cargo is handled without incident.

---

 

 

Step 6: Checking Tank Dryness & OBQ (On Board Quantity) Before Loading

Before a tanker receives a single barrel of oil, there is one last critical step: confirming the condition of cargo tanks. The ship may be structurally ready, the plan may be signed, the crew may be briefed — but unless tanks are demonstrably dry and clean, loading cannot begin.

This step is more than housekeeping; it is about trust between charterer, terminal, and ship. It ensures that the cargo being loaded will not be contaminated, and that no disputes arise later about “short delivery” caused by hidden residues.

---

Why Dryness and OBQ Matter

OBQ (On Board Quantity) is the amount of cargo or residues remaining in tanks before new cargo is loaded. MARPOL defines OBQ as any slops, sludge, oil, or vapors that can affect the next load.

Why is OBQ so important?

1. Commercial impact: If tanks are not empty, new cargo loaded on top may appear “short” compared to the Bill of Lading. A difference of even 0.2% can mean millions of dollars on a VLCC cargo.

2. Contamination risk: Residual fuel oil in a tank intended for diesel or jet fuel can ruin an entire batch.

3. Legal disputes: OBQ surveys are often the focal point in cargo claims and arbitrations.

4. Operational safety: Sludge and residues can obstruct suction bells, affecting cargo pumping later.

According to UK P&I Club (2020), over 25% of tanker cargo claims originate from OBQ discrepancies.

---

Methods of Checking Tank Dryness

Tank dryness inspections are conducted by both ship’s crew and independent surveyors (e.g., SGS, Saybolt, Inspectorate).

• Visual inspection: Officers climb down (or use remote cameras) to check tank bottoms for visible oil, water, or sludge.

• Closed gauging systems: Portable gauging (MMC, UTI) detects residues without tank entry.

• Soundings and ullages: Compared against calibration tables to determine any liquid present.

• Odor tests: Strong oil smell can indicate hidden clingage.

If residues are detected, tanks must be cleaned or designated for compatible cargo.

Case example: In 2017, a product tanker at Singapore was delayed 24 hours after inspectors found kerosene residues in a tank designated for jet fuel. The charterer refused loading until tanks were cleaned and certified.

---

Dryness Certificates

Once tanks are confirmed clean, surveyors issue a Dryness Certificate. This certificate is:

• Signed by surveyor, Master, and Chief Officer.

• Attached to cargo documentation.

• Used as evidence if disputes arise later.

Without a valid Dryness Certificate, terminals often refuse to start cargo transfer.

---

The Role of OBQ Surveys

The OBQ survey quantifies any liquid or sludge on board. Surveyors measure:

• Water bottom (using water-finding paste).

• Sludge and ROB (Remaining On Board).

• Vapor effects on ullage readings.

These quantities are subtracted from the B/L cargo figure to calculate Net Cargo Loaded.

The ship and shore must agree on OBQ numbers. If disagreements occur, both sides issue Letters of Protest.

---

Common Issues with OBQ

1. Disputes Over “Nil OBQ”

   • Ships sometimes declare tanks dry (“nil OBQ”) when surveyors find residues.

   • Leads to mistrust and financial claims.

2. Slops Mismanagement

   • Slops carried from previous voyages must be declared. Concealing them can result in charter party breaches.

3. Temperature and Vapor Effects

   • Residual vapors can skew ullage readings, especially in volatile cargoes.

4. Surveyor Access Limitations

   • In bad weather or unsafe conditions, full inspections may not be possible. This often leads to “conditional” certificates.

---

Case Study: OBQ Dispute in West Africa

In 2019, a Suezmax declared nil OBQ before loading crude. During discharge at Rotterdam, receivers claimed a 0.5% shortfall. Investigation revealed unreported slops in a wing tank, which had diluted the cargo. The dispute escalated to arbitration, costing the owners over $3 million in settlement and legal fees.

Lesson learned: Transparency during OBQ surveys protects both owner and charterer.

---

Human Factor in OBQ Surveys

For many junior officers, OBQ surveys are the first time they see the commercial side of tanker operations. It is not only about technical precision but also about negotiation and trust.

• Masters and Chief Officers must act with integrity: hiding residues damages reputation.

• Surveyors rely on cooperation — obstructing them often leads to suspicion.

• Cadets learn that OBQ is where math meets money: ullages and soundings directly translate into cargo dollars.

---

OBQ in Regulatory Context

• MARPOL Annex I: Requires accurate record-keeping of cargo residues and slops.

• SOLAS: Enforces tank entry safety procedures during inspections.

• ISM Code: Demands OBQ surveys be documented in SMS records.

• P&I Clubs: Insist on proper OBQ records for claims defense.

---

Challenges and Future Outlook

Modern loading faces new pressures:

• Environmental regulation: stricter MARPOL Annex I compliance and VOC emission limits.

• Digitalisation: real-time ullage sensors, stress monitoring, and predictive analytics.

• Alternative fuels: methanol, LNG, ammonia introduce new safety paradigms.

• Training: IMO Model Courses and simulator training increasingly used for cadets.

FAQ

1. Why can’t tanks be filled 100%?
MARPOL mandates the 98% rule to prevent overflow from thermal expansion.

2. What is OBQ?
On Board Quantity — residues, sludge, or cargo remaining before loading.

3. How long does loading take?
VLCCs typically load in 24–36 hours, depending on terminal rate and number of grades.

4. What is the Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL)?
A joint ISGOTT document signed by Master and Loading Master before cargo flow.

5. What is the Vessel Experience Factor (VEF)?
A historical ship–shore correction factor used in cargo quantity disputes.

Conclusion

Tanker loading is not simply “filling tanks.” It is a complex operation where physics, law, environment, and commerce intersect. From pre-port checks and loading calculations to OBQ surveys and ship–shore meetings, every step is governed by international conventions and industry best practice.

For maritime cadets, these operations mark the moment where textbooks meet reality. For officers, they are reminders that safety and trust underpin global oil trade. And for the world, they are proof that the maritime industry works tirelessly to balance efficiency with responsibility.

As the sector moves toward alternative fuels and digitalisation, one truth remains: discipline and preparation are the heart of safe tanker loading.

References

• International Maritime Organization (IMO). MARPOL Annex I; SOLAS.

• ICS & OCIMF. International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals (ISGOTT).

• UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2024.

• Lloyd’s Register, ABS, DNV, ClassNK. Tanker Loading Guidelines.

• UK P&I Club (2020). Loss Prevention Reports on OBQ and Cargo Claims.

• Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB, 2021). Tanker Accident Reports.

• The Nautical Institute. Tanker Operations and Cargo Handling Guides.

• Tanker Loading Manual.