Top 12 Rare Navigational Instruments Used in Maritime History

Explore 12 rare navigational instruments—from the kamal to Kelvin’s sounding machine—how they worked, who used them, and how they shaped maritime history.”

Before GPS, there was grit, ingenuity—and wood, brass, and wire

Long before ECDIS overlays and satellite fixes, mariners crossed oceans using tools you could fit in a sea chest. Many were simple—wooden boards, strings, pegs. Others were gleaming brass mechanisms so precise they changed science itself. These instruments did more than point the way; they trained generations of seafarers to think like navigators: to estimate, check, and adapt.

This long-form guide opens that chest and examines twelve rare or less-known navigational instruments that shaped how ships found their way. You’ll meet the kamal—a palm-sized latitude finder on the monsoon routes—and the Borda reflecting circle, a precision instrument beloved by hydrographers. You’ll see how a traverse board and a chip log turned watchstanding into mathematics, and how Harrison’s H4 solved a global problem from inside a pocket watch. Each section blends human stories with clear explanations and links to authoritative collections and museums for deeper study.

Tip for students: whenever you see an unfamiliar concept (e.g., “horizontal sextant angles”), anchor it to a real task a navigator faced each watch: Where are we now? How fast are we going? If this fails, what’s Plan B?


Why historical instruments still matter in modern maritime operations

Today’s bridge teams rely on layers of redundancy—GNSS, gyro, Doppler log, AIS, radar, visual bearings. But the logic behind modern procedures comes straight from these older instruments:

  • Multiple independent lines of evidence. The habit of verifying a DR track with speed (chip log), time (sandglass), and heading (pelorus) is the ancestor of today’s cross-checks between GNSS, radar ranges, and visual bearings.

  • Managing uncertainty. The repeating and averaging techniques of the Borda circle mirror today’s insistence on multiple fixes and error bars.

  • Human factors. Tools like the traverse board transformed complex motion into quick, shared updates—an early form of “team situational awareness.”

  • Resilience. A navigator comfortable with first principles is less likely to be stranded by a single-point failure. That’s why STCW training still nods to the sextant and chronometer tradition—and why museums like Royal Museums Greenwich keep these instruments working for education.


How this guide is organised

Each instrument gets a short origin story, a how-it-works explanation in plain language, and a short use case showing what problem it solved at sea. Where possible, we link to collections so you can view catalogued examples or read deeper notes from curators and historians.


The Top 12 Rare Navigational Instruments

1) The Kamal: a string, a small board, and the monsoon world

Why it matters. The kamal is one of the simplest and most elegant latitude instruments. Likely developed by Arab navigators in the early second millennium CE and used widely across the Indian Ocean, it allowed sailors to sail a parallel by holding a wooden card at arm’s length and aligning its top and bottom with a star (often Polaris) and the horizon. The distance knots along the cord corresponded to latitude.

How it worked. The navigator tied knots at measured intervals along a cord and attached it to a small board. By placing the board at a consistent arm’s length (or a specified knot held between the teeth), the angular height of a star translated to latitude with repeatable accuracy—good enough to keep to seasonal routes between Arabia, East Africa, and India.

Use case. Picture a dhow leaving Aden, bound for Calicut on a night of clear skies. The kamal gives a quick, silent check on latitude—no oil lamps required—and complements dead reckoning between monsoon winds and coastal landmarks.


2) The Mariner’s Astrolabe: a storm-ready altitude ring

Why it matters. If the kamal was minimalism, the mariner’s astrolabe was ruggedisation. It took an astronomical instrument and cut away the wind sail—literally. Portuguese navigators in the 15th century used heavy, open-framed brass rings to measure the sun or a star’s altitude for latitude, the weight keeping it steady in heavy weather.

How it worked. Suspended vertically, the ring had degree scales and an alidade (sighting rule). The observer aligned the alidade with the body and read the altitude where the alidade crossed the scale. The instrument’s mass and perforations reduced wind error, a major problem on rolling decks.

Use case. Crossing the South Atlantic on a caravel, a pilot grabbed the astrolabe between squalls to get a noon sight through a patch of sun, anchoring the day’s DR with a latitude line.


3) The Cross-Staff (Fore-staff / Jacob’s staff): simplicity with a sting

Why it matters. The cross-staff was a wooden staff with sliding cross-pieces (vanes) to measure angles between the horizon and a celestial body. It democratized latitude finding but had a glaring flaw: observers had to stare at the sun. That drove the search for safer designs.

How it worked. Hold the long staff to the cheek, slide the cross-piece until its ends align with the horizon and the sun. The position of the vane on the graduated staff gave the altitude. It worked, but was fatiguing and risky to the eyes.

Use case. Northern summer in the North Sea: the cross-staff gives a quick meridian altitude when clouds part for a moment. The mate squints through lashings of glare, gets a usable number—and a reminder that better instruments were inevitable.


4) The Davis Backstaff (English Quadrant): turning your back to the sun

Why it matters. Introduced in the late 16th century by John Davis, the backstaff solved the eye-safety problem. You measured the sun’s altitude with your back to it, using a shadow on a scale instead of direct sight. It became a mainstay of English navigation.

How it worked. Two arcs and a set of vanes created a geometry where the sun’s shadow vane projected onto a horizon vane while the observer looked forward to the horizon. The angle on the scale gave altitude. No more staring at the sun, and better precision than the cross-staff.

Use case. Coastal run down the English Channel: a quick noon sight with the backstaff gives confidence amid tidal set and busy traffic, feeding the day’s estimated position with a safer, repeatable reading.


5) The Nocturnal (Nocturlabe): telling time from the stars

Why it matters. Before reliable ship timepieces, knowing local time at night was tricky. The nocturnal used the rotation of circumpolar stars (especially around Polaris) to estimate time, which then helped with tide calculations or preparing for dawn sights.

How it worked. A handheld disk with rotating pointers was set for date and aligned to known stars (e.g., Kochab and Mizar). The read-off gave an approximate time. Many nocturnals also carried handy tables on the reverse—for Pole Star corrections, compass roses, or tide rules.

Use case. A pilot entering a tidal estuary at night checks the nocturnal to sense the tide window, bridging a gap until the sandglass and watch system can anchor a more formal routine.


6) The Traverse Board: the analog memory of a watch

Why it matters. The traverse board is beautifully simple—and very rare on modern ships. It turned eight half-hours of heading and speed into a pegboard tally, so at the end of the watch the helmsman could hand the navigator a compact DR record.

How it worked. A circular board drilled with rows of holes along 32 compass points and arc segments for speed. Every half hour—timed by a sandglass—the helmsman pushed pegs into the appropriate holes for course steered and speed (from the chip log). At watch change, the pegs were reset and the data transferred to the logbook and track.

Use case. North Atlantic, overcast for days. No celestial lines, just dead reckoning. The traverse board’s simple, human-proof format preserves the story of the last four hours—enough to keep the DR honest despite drizzle and fatigue.


7) The Chip Log and Sandglass: where “knots” came from

Why it matters. If you’ve ever said “the ship is making 14 knots,” you are quoting a 16th-century technology. The chip log (a quarter-circle wooden “chip” towed astern) and a timed sandglass gave speed through water; counting the knots passing through the hand produced the unit we still use.

How it worked. A weighted wooden chip, attached to a bridle, acted as a drogue. As the ship moved away, line paid out for a fixed interval; the number of knots (set at calibrated spacings) passing through the hand gave speed. Different fleets used slightly different intervals and spacings, but the principle was the same.

Use case. Foggy morning; the mate wants a speed for a DR run across a bank. The crew casts the chip log, flips a 28-second glass, counts knots, and calls out a speed—rough, but actionable.


8) Hadley’s Octant: the leap to reflecting instruments

Why it matters. In the 1730s, John Hadley introduced the octant, a reflecting instrument that doubled the measured angle and allowed accurate sights with mirrors rather than shadow tricks. It bridged the gap to the later sextant and brought precision into practical navigation at sea.

How it worked. Two mirrors—index and horizon—let the observer bring the image of a celestial body down to the horizon while looking straight ahead. The octant spanned 45° of arc (hence “octant”) but read up to 90° because of the reflection principle. It was lighter and easier to use than a backstaff and worked for both sun and stars.

Use case. A watch officer on a broad reach takes a morning sun sight with the octant. The ease of lining up images yields repeatable angles and better celestial fixes than earlier tools.


9) Borda’s Reflecting Circle (Repeating Circle): precision by repetition

Why it matters. The Borda circle (late 18th–19th century) took the mirror principle further. By measuring the same angle repeatedly around a full circle and averaging the result, navigators could cancel random errors—ideal for hydrographic surveying. Surviving instruments show exquisite engineering.

How it worked. A circular frame (often graduated from 0–720°) with telescope and mirrors allowed repeated observations of the same angle without resetting to zero. The sum of several measurements divided by the count yielded a refined result, cutting instrument and handling errors.

Use case. A survey party off a rocky coast needs high-quality angles between headlands to place soundings precisely. The reflecting circle’s repeat method delivers accuracy without relying on any single “perfect” sight.


10) The Marine Chronometer (Harrison’s H4): the longitude breakthrough

Why it matters. Determining longitude required accurate time. John Harrison’s H4 (1759) proved that a compact, reliable marine timekeeper could survive at sea and keep time precise enough to compute longitude from a single celestial observation and a Greenwich reference. Navigation changed forever.

How it worked. If you know the Greenwich time and observe local noon (or use lunar distances/star sights), the time difference converts to degrees of longitude (15° per hour). H4’s stability meant navigators could trust the reference time over long passages.

Use case. A frigate in the South Atlantic takes sun sights and reads a chronometer time traceable to Greenwich. The calculated longitude—no longer guesswork—lets the captain choose a safe approach to land after weeks out of sight of shore.


11) The Station Pointer: plotting with horizontal sextant angles

Why it matters. Hydrographers discovered that horizontal angles between pairs of shore features could fix a position without a compass—ideal in high latitudes or areas of magnetic disturbance. The station pointer, essentially a three-arm protractor set to measured angles, made the plotting step fast and reliable.

How it worked. After taking two horizontal angles with a sextant (e.g., A-B and B-C), the surveyor set the station pointer’s arms to those angles and laid it on the chart so its arms crossed the three known points. The centre of the instrument marked the vessel’s position. It was central to 19th-century coastal surveying and polar work.

Use case. Near-shore survey in the Antarctic, where compass deviation is severe: the coxswain holds position off a cliff face while the leadsman sounds; the surveyor takes two angles, sets the station pointer, and plots a fix—no magnetic heading required.


12) Kelvin/Thomson’s Sounding Machine (“Kelvite”): depth by wire and chemistry

Why it matters. The lead-line was reliable but slow and inaccurate at speed. In the late 19th century, William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) designed a wire-line sounding machine that measured depth quickly on moving ships. A chemical-marked glass tube indicated how far water rose inside, recording depth even in deep soundings. The Royal Navy adopted improved versions into the 20th century.

How it worked. A fine steel wire spooled off a drum over a small boom with a lead weight (the “sinker”). A chemically prepared glass tube mounted above the lead discoloured where seawater reached; the mark correlated with pressure and thus depth. The dial also read wire paid out, giving a second check.

Use case. A cruiser approaching an unfamiliar bay at speed takes “flying soundings” without stopping. Within minutes the bridge team has a profile of the bottom, enough to pick a safe track and anchor berth.


Bonus gallery: uncommon but noteworthy tools

  • Artificial Mercurial Horizon. Primarily for land use (surveyors, explorers), this mercury trough and roof allowed accurate celestial angles without a visible sea horizon—handy in harbours, deserts, and polar ice. Curators at leading museums preserve elegant examples.

  • Walker’s Taffrail Log. A late-19th/20th-century mechanical log that replaced the chip log with a rotating vane towed astern and a dial recorder mounted at the taffrail. Mariners loved its practicality for continuous distance and speed.


From wood and brass to bridge procedures: what these instruments taught seafarers

The craft of error management

Every one of these devices assumed noise—swell, wind, tired eyes. Solutions included repetition (Borda circle), averaging (multiple sights), and layered evidence (chip log + traverse board + bearings). Today’s ECDIS checklists and radar/visual cross-checks echo the same logic.

The culture of note-keeping

Traverse boards turned into logbooks; chip log readings became speed curves; lunar and chronometer sights became sight reduction forms. The habit of writing how a fix was obtained persists in passage plans and post-incident reports.

The habit of contingency

When the nocturnal told the hour or the station pointer bypassed a misbehaving compass, navigators learned to think: If X fails, use Y. That mindset underpins modern BRM (Bridge Resource Management) and SOLAS-driven redundancy.


Case studies / Real-world applications

Latitude without a sextant: Kamal sailing on the monsoon lanes

Oral histories and regional manuscripts describe Indian Ocean navigators practicing “latitude sailing” with the kamal: they first reached the correct latitude, then followed it east or west to the destination’s longitude by coastal cues and seasonal winds. Its portability and no-glass, no-metal construction made it durable on small craft.

Hydrography’s quiet revolution: Angles, not bearings

Nineteenth-century hydrographers reported that the station pointer unlocked routine, accurate fixes in swell and magnetic disturbance, allowing thousands of soundings to be positioned with new confidence. That accuracy fed national chart enterprises and reshaped approaches to coasts worldwide.

Speed becomes a number: From “good sailing” to knots per hour

When writers like William Bourne described the log and line in the 16th century, they gave navigators a way to quantify speed. With speed and time known, distance traveled in a watch could be plotted on the traverse board—a quiet data revolution that sharpened dead reckoning across the Age of Sail.

Longitude leaves the black box: H4’s public proof

The Board of Longitude’s trials and Harrison’s persistent engineering turned the chronometer from an idea into an industry. By the 19th century, long-distance commerce and naval logistics relied on chronometer networks and observatory time signals, a precursor to today’s UTC discipline—and to our expectation that position fixing should be precise, routine, and fast.

Soundings at speed: A wire, a dial, and chemistry

Kelvin’s machine did for depths what the chronometer did for time: made accuracy routine. A ship could now stride along the coast, casting soundings without hoving to—vital for naval operations, cable routes, and commercial harbour approaches.


Challenges and how navigators solved them

Roll, pitch, and glare

Open-deck observation meant instruments had to fight motion and light. The mariner’s astrolabe added weight and wind cut-outs; the backstaff avoided direct sunlight; the octant introduced shades and mirrors to stabilise the image.

Human reliability under fatigue

The traverse board’s pegs and the chip log’s simple counts made it harder to record nonsense under pressure. The Borda circle institutionalised repeat measurements so any one shaky sight didn’t dominate the answer.

Magnetic mischief

Near the poles or over iron-rich geology, the compass could mislead. Hydrographers leaned on horizontal sextant angles and the station pointer to sidestep magnetic troubles entirely.


Future outlook: why this history belongs on modern bridges

As GNSS jamming and spoofing episodes remind us, resilient navigation blends technology with first principles. Maritime academies increasingly teach “degraded mode” nav: radar ranges, visual bearings, manual DR—and yes, maintenance of sextants and time discipline. Understanding older instruments is not nostalgia; it’s risk management.

For safety managers and DPA offices, showcasing a chronometer or an octant in the mess room isn’t just decor. It signals a culture that values the craft of navigation, not just the compliance of it. If you’re curating, the collections at Royal Museums Greenwich and national museums offer high-quality images, labels, and research notes to support training.


FAQ (rich-snippet ready)

1) Which instruments here are truly “rare”?
Most are rare in service today (e.g., kamal, nocturnal, traverse board, Borda circle, station pointer, Kelvin machine). Sextants and chronometers survive in training, but their early forms (Hadley octants, Harrison’s H4) are museum-grade.

2) Why include the chronometer if it isn’t obscure?
Because H4 solved longitude at sea—arguably the single greatest leap in navigation—and its specific form is rare and historically pivotal.

3) Did navigators really use a pegboard (traverse board)?
Yes. It compacted a watch’s worth of course and speed into a simple visual record, later transcribed into the log and track.

4) Are horizontal sextant angles still useful?
Absolutely for teaching and in degraded-mode coastal navigation; the station pointer made plotting fast, and the method avoids compass errors. Hydrographic texts and museum notes document its long service.

5) Where can I see these instruments today?
Start with Royal Museums Greenwich online collections and exhibits (e.g., Harrison’s timekeepers, octants, mariner’s astrolabes, sounding machines). The Smithsonian and regional maritime museums also hold station pointers, taffrail logs, and nocturnals.

6) What modern skills map to these old tools?

  • Kamal / astrolabe / octant → celestial basics & error budgets

  • Traverse board / chip log → DR discipline & time-speed-distance

  • Station pointer → geometry of fixes & plotting without magnetic bearings

  • Kelvin machine → soundings, under-keel clearance thinking

7) Do professional standards still value this knowledge?
Yes. STCW requires competence in terrestrial and celestial navigation fundamentals, and the seamanship mindset these instruments foster—cross-checks, redundancy, thoughtful plotting—remains central to safe operations under SOLAS/ISM cultures.


Conclusion: The tools may be rare, but the mindset is timeless

From a string-and-board kamal to a wire-and-chemistry sounding machine, these instruments look quaint beside satellite receivers. Yet the mind that uses them—skeptical, methodical, cross-checking—remains the bedrock of safe passage.

If you’re a cadet, let this list become a reading (and museum-visiting) plan. If you’re a trainer, fold a heritage module into your bridge curriculum to sharpen discussions about error, redundancy, and degraded-mode navigation. If you sail, consider keeping a sextant and a paper mindset aboard, if only to remind the team that navigation is a conversation with uncertainty—a conversation mariners have been having for centuries.

Fair winds—and may your fixes be elegant, whatever century’s tool you hold.


References

  • Royal Museums Greenwich (RMG), Collections & Stories
    Mariner’s astrolabe; object notes and overview.
    Nocturnal (nocturlabe); collection object and explainer.
    Traverse board; collection note.
    Log and line (“chip log”); object note and “How to make a log line.”
    Cross-staff; collection objects.
    Backstaff (Davis quadrant); object and history.
    Borda reflecting circle; collection notes.
    Octant (Hadley); several examples and labels.
    Harrison’s H4; object page and timekeeper exhibit.
    Sounding machine (Kelvin/Thomson); history and object page.

  • The Mariners’ Museum and Park — Ages of Exploration
    Kamal and Traverse Board concise histories.

  • Smithsonian & US resources
    Station pointer object entry (National Museum of American History).
    US Navy History & Heritage Command — Navigational Instruments overview.

  • Scholarship & Hydrography
    The Origins of the Station Pointer, The International Hydrographic Review (PDF).
    History of Hydrography (PDF): station pointer and horizontal angles in RN practice.

  • Supplementary
    Chip log (encyclopedic overview with references).
    Kelvite (Kelvin) sounding machine (encyclopedic overview with references).

Rate this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *