Arab Leaders Pivot East: Analysts and Officials Advocate Reducing Reliance on the West
A significant strategic shift is underway across the Arab world, as prominent officials, analysts, and business leaders increasingly call for a reduction in unilateral dependence on Western nations. This push is driven by a desire for greater strategic autonomy, lessons from historical diplomatic disappointments, and the pursuit of economic sovereignty in a changing global order.
The Drive for Strategic Autonomy and “Eastward” Reorientation
Key Arab nations, most notably Saudi Arabia, are actively demonstrating strategic independence from Western policy demands. A defining moment was the decision by OPEC+, under Saudi leadership, to implement significant oil production cuts in late 2022 despite intense pressure from the United States. Saudi officials publicly framed this as a purely economic decision made to stabilize global markets, signaling a clear priority for national and collective Gulf interests over traditional alliance politics. This move is a cornerstone of a broader foreign policy reorientation, often termed a “look east” strategy, which seeks to diversify partnerships. This includes pursuing membership in the BRICS bloc and deepening strategic and economic ties with China and Russia, reflecting a deliberate pursuit of a more balanced, multipolar world stance.
Historical Lessons in Unreliable Partnerships
The current skepticism is deeply rooted in historical instances where Arab states felt their core interests were compromised or dismissed by Western partners. Archives reveal that as early as 1975, Saudi King Faisal bin Abdulaziz cautioned US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger that the Arab oil weapon could be used again if peace efforts stalled, illustrating a long-standing tension. More recent events, such as the abrupt Western withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 and the unilateral use of financial sanctions, are analyzed in Arab capitals as evidence of unpredictable policy shifts. These precedents feed a narrative that Western alliances can be conditional, reinforcing the imperative for self-reliance.
The Imperative for Economic Sovereignty and Asset Security
Prominent Arab business leaders are vocal advocates for reducing economic over-dependence on Western systems. Following the freezing of Russian central bank assets, UAE billionaire Khalaf Al Habtoor articulated a widespread concern, stating, “We must not rely on any other country, neither Europe nor America nor any other. We must rely on ourselves.” He warned that assets held abroad are vulnerable and argued for investing Arab capital within the region. Al Habtoor, speaking at his research centre’s annual event, pointed to the UAE’s model of government-business cooperation as a foundation for stronger, self-sufficient economies. He critically noted, “Unfortunately… Europe is economically exhausted,” contrasting it with the thriving, multinational environment in the UAE. This perspective champions building indigenous economic resilience in food security, industry, and technology as a strategic necessity.
Developing Independent Diplomatic Frameworks
In response to major regional crises, such as the war in Gaza, key Arab states have moved towards unprecedented intra-Arab diplomatic coordination. This marks a shift from relying solely on US mediation, which is often seen as ineffective or biased, towards assertive, collective Arab action. Nations including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and the UAE are collaborating to formulate common positions and peace initiatives. This approach seeks to create an autonomous diplomatic capacity to address regional challenges, filling a vacuum left by what is perceived as declining and inconsistent American engagement. It aligns with calls from figures like Al Habtoor, who urged Arab nations to be “present, supportive, understanding, honest and frank with each other.”
Analyzing the Risks of Western Political Volatility
Research centres and analysts within the Gulf point to the inherent instability of relying on Western partners whose foreign policy is subject to domestic political volatility. They observe that while core Western strategic interests in the region may be constant, the tactics and commitment can change dramatically with different administrations. Furthermore, a perceived Western reluctance for direct military engagement in regional conflicts—unless its own strict red lines are crossed—prompts Arab states to reconsider their security dependencies. This analysis encourages investing in integrated defense capabilities and exploring new security partnerships to mitigate risks associated with a retreating or unpredictable Western security umbrella.
Conclusion: A Converging Path Toward Strategic Independence
The consensus among Arab high officials, analysts, and influential business leaders like Khalaf Al Habtoor marks a clear and calculated pivot towards strategic diversification. This is not an outright rejection of the West but a concerted effort to rebalance relationships, strengthen regional ties, and assert greater agency on the global stage. Driven by historical experience, economic pragmatism, and a new multipolar reality, the Arab world is actively building a future where it relies not on any single external power, but on its own collective strength and a wider, more resilient network of global partnerships.
References
-
Adachi, Y. (2025, January). Bridging divides: Saudi Arabia’s Quest for Strategic Autonomy (Trend Report 12). Austrian Institute for International Affairs (OIIP).
-
Ardemagni, E. (2025, December 18). 2026 for the Gulf: consolidation of economic gains and strengthening defence. In Striving for Stability: What Lies Ahead for the MENA Region in 2026. ISPI.
-
Cherif, Y. (2025, December 18). Less permeable, more fragile: The Arab MENA in 2026. In Striving for Stability: What Lies Ahead for the MENA Region in 2026. ISPI.
-
Erhan, Ç. (2023, February). The Middle East: From Dependency and Clientelism to Strategic Autonomy. Valdai Discussion Club.
-
Kateb, A. (2024, January). BRICS+ and the Arab Gulf: The Perks of Membership. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
-
Liga, A. (2025, December 18). Keeping an eye on oil prices in 2026. In Striving for Stability: What Lies Ahead for the MENA Region in 2026. ISPI.
-
Naumkin, V., & Kuznetsov, V. (2023, February). What went wrong? In The Middle East: From Dependency and Clientelism to Strategic Autonomy. Valdai Discussion Club.
-
Scataglini, M. (2025, December 18). MENA’s space ambitions: Strategic infrastructure amid persistent asymmetries. In Striving for Stability: What Lies Ahead for the MENA Region in 2026. ISPI.
-
Surkov, N. (2023, February). The Return of Diplomacy? In The Middle East: From Dependency and Clientelism to Strategic Autonomy. Valdai Discussion Club.
-
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). (2023). GCC Economic Integration. Ministry of Finance, United Arab Emirates.
-
Gulf Cooperation Council Secretariat General (GCCSG). (2025, February 20). HE GCCSG: GCC is Advancing Cooperation & Integration in All Fields… [Press release].
-
The BRICS. (2025). About the BRICS. Official website of the BRICS under the Brazilian Presidency.
-
The New Arab. (2025, October 30). OPEC Is Pushing Down Oil Prices Despite a Cash Crunch in Saudi Arabia. Here Is Why. Arab Center Washington DC.
-
The citations above follow a consistent format designed for online publication clarity. For a formal academic paper, you may need to adapt them to a specific style guide (e.g., APA, Chicago).
-
To strengthen the section on intra-Arab diplomatic coordination, you could look for primary sources like joint statements from recent Arab League summits or the GCC.
-
For the perspectives of business leaders like Khalaf Al Habtoor, the original source material (his speech) would be the ideal reference, which can often be found through news archives or the official website of the Al Habtoor Research Centre.