Shipboard incinerators explained in plain terms: SOLAS fire safety links, IMO/MARPOL rules, incinerator types, and what waste streams can be burned legally.
A ship is like a small, moving city. People live and work onboard for weeks or months, engines run continuously, and daily operations generate waste—oily residues, packaging, food waste, rags, and sometimes medical or operational waste depending on the vessel type. On land, most of this is handled by municipal systems. At sea, the ship must manage it responsibly, legally, and safely.
That is where the shipboard incinerator often enters the picture. For many ships, it is not just a “waste burner.” It is part of a wider compliance system that connects environmental rules (what is allowed to be incinerated and where) with fire safety rules (how to prevent an incinerator from becoming the start of an engine-room fire). Understanding incinerators properly therefore requires a combined view of IMO environmental instruments—especially MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 16—and the broader SOLAS fire safety framework that governs machinery spaces and fire protection systems.
This article explains shipboard incinerators in clear maritime English: what they are, which waste streams they handle, what the IMO rules actually require, how ship types and trading patterns influence incinerator use, and what “good practice” looks like from a safety and compliance standpoint.
Why This Topic Matters for Maritime Operations
Shipboard incineration sits at the intersection of three high-stakes operational realities: environmental compliance, fire safety, and port state control risk. A well-run incinerator can reduce waste storage burdens and improve hygiene onboard; a poorly managed one can lead to illegal incineration, machinery-space fires, toxic exposure, or detentions. The IMO regulates shipboard incineration under MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 16, including restrictions on where incineration may occur and the substances that are prohibited.
The Regulatory Backbone: MARPOL and SOLAS in Practical Terms
MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 16: the core incineration rulebook
When people ask “What are the rules for shipboard incinerators?”, the most direct answer is MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 16 (Shipboard Incineration). Regulation 16 governs what can be incinerated, where incineration may take place, and when an IMO Type Approval is required.
Regulation 16 is sometimes misunderstood as “the incinerator rule” only, but it is broader. It covers incineration occurring in:
-
Dedicated shipboard incinerators, and
-
In certain cases, main/auxiliary engines or boilers (specifically for some ship-generated residues), with additional location restrictions.
A particularly operationally relevant point is that incineration of sewage sludge and sludge oil generated during normal ship operation may be permitted in the main or auxiliary power plant or boilers, but not inside ports, harbours, or estuaries in those cases. This is often an inspection focus because the evidence trail (logs, crew statements, ash handling, and operational records) can reveal whether ships are following the location restriction in practice.
The “Standard for Shipboard Incinerators” and IMO Type Approval
If Regulation 16 is the “what and where,” the Standard Specification for Shipboard Incinerators is the “how the equipment must perform.” The current widely referenced standard is MEPC.244(66), which provides design, manufacture, performance, operation, and testing expectations, and it is directly tied to the issuance of IMO type approval certificates.
This matters because certain wastes—most famously PVC—are generally prohibited to incinerate, except in incinerators that have the relevant IMO type approval certification.
Where SOLAS enters the story: fire risk, machinery spaces, and fire safety systems
SOLAS is not the primary “incineration legality” instrument—MARPOL is. However, SOLAS and the Fire Safety Systems (FSS) Code framework are central to how incinerators are arranged, protected, and operated without creating unacceptable fire hazards.
From an operational perspective, the linkage is straightforward: an incinerator is a controlled combustion system onboard. Any combustion system—especially one burning mixed waste streams—must be treated as a potential ignition source, requiring robust safety arrangements, fire detection, ventilation discipline, and procedures that fit the vessel’s machinery-space fire safety philosophy.
Shipboard Incinerators: What They Actually Do Onboard
A shipboard incinerator is designed to thermally destroy certain ship-generated wastes at high temperatures, typically with controlled air supply, staged combustion, and an exhaust system that routes flue gases to a funnel uptake. Many marine incinerators are engineered to handle both solid waste (such as contaminated rags, paper/cardboard, and sometimes food waste depending on company policies) and liquid waste (particularly oily sludge and sludge oil from fuel and lube oil purification systems).
Operationally, incinerators are rarely “set and forget.” They require trained handling because waste composition changes day by day, and incorrect loading or poor combustion control can produce smoke, incomplete burn, slagging, or unsafe conditions. The incinerator’s value is highest when it is integrated into a vessel’s broader waste management plan: segregation, storage, recordkeeping, and discharge to port reception facilities when required.
Types of Shipboard Incinerators and Common Configurations
Batch (intermittent) incinerators
Batch incinerators are common on many merchant ships. Waste is loaded in batches, the cycle runs through ignition, main burn, and burnout, and then the chamber is allowed to cool before ash removal. Batch systems are operationally flexible, but they are sensitive to loading practices. Overloading, poor segregation, or wet waste can lead to incomplete combustion and higher smoke generation.
Continuous-feed or semi-continuous systems
Some vessels—especially those with higher waste generation or specific operational profiles—use systems that allow more continuous feeding, sometimes with mechanical assistance. In practice, many “continuous” setups are semi-continuous, with controlled feed intervals to maintain stable combustion conditions.
Sludge oil incinerators and combined waste incinerators
A key driver for incinerators is the need to manage sludge oil and related oily residues that accumulate from normal engine-room operations. While ships can discharge certain wastes ashore, port reception facilities are not always convenient, cost-effective, or available at the required call frequency. This is one reason sludge-burning capability is common in marine incinerator designs: it reduces storage pressure in sludge tanks and oily waste systems.
Capacity and approval considerations
Incinerators are not interchangeable “boxes.” Their permitted operating envelope is tied to their certification and design standard. This influences what the crew sees: control systems, alarms, safe operating ranges, and procedures that should match the approved manual.
Waste Streams: What Ships Generate, and What Incinerators Can Handle
Ship waste is often best understood by linking it to the IMO’s “Annex” structure (oily residues, sewage, garbage, air emissions). Even when incineration is permitted, waste must be segregated and recorded properly; otherwise, a legal waste stream can become a compliance failure due to poor documentation or contamination.
Oily residues and sludge oil
Oily residues are produced by normal operations—fuel oil separators, lube oil purification, drain tanks, filter changes, and machinery leaks. Sludge oil is operationally persistent: if the ship runs, sludge will be generated. Regulation 16 recognizes the incineration of sludge oil and sewage sludge as a shipboard option under defined conditions.
Sewage sludge
Sewage treatment systems can generate sludge depending on plant type and operating mode. Regulation 16 explicitly addresses ship-generated sewage sludge incineration pathways (including the restrictions when done in main or auxiliary plants/boilers).
Garbage and operational waste
Garbage categories include plastics, food waste, domestic waste, operational waste, cooking oil, and incinerator ashes. While MARPOL Annex V governs garbage discharges, incineration intersects with Annex V because the ship’s garbage plan often determines what is incinerated, what is landed ashore, and what is stored. Incinerator ash itself is a waste stream that must be handled responsibly and documented.
Plastics and PVC: the area where ships get into trouble
In practice, “plastics” is where many crews become uncertain, especially under workload pressure. PVC incineration is generally prohibited, except in approved shipboard incinerators with the relevant IMO type approval certificate.
The practical lesson is simple: even if a ship has an incinerator, that does not automatically mean plastic is acceptable. The ship must confirm the incinerator’s certificate scope, the company’s procedures, and the crew’s training.
Cargo-related residues and contaminated materials
A common misconception is that “if it is onboard, it can be burned.” Regulation 16 prohibits incineration of certain cargo residues and contaminated materials linked to MARPOL Annexes I, II, and III (oil, noxious liquid substances, and harmful substances in packaged form), as well as certain contaminated packing materials. This is one reason cargo ships with tank cleaning residues must be especially disciplined: mixing cargo residues into an incinerator stream can quickly create a serious violation.
Substances explicitly prohibited from shipboard incineration
Operators should treat the “prohibited list” as a strict boundary, not a flexible guideline. The best practice is to keep a simple “never burn” reference in the incinerator operating area and reinforce it in routine safety meetings, especially before inspections or crew changes.
How Incinerator Type Approval and Documentation Work in the Real World
Why the certificate matters during inspections
An inspector does not have to “guess” what your incinerator can burn. Type approval documentation establishes the approved design and test basis under the Standard Specification.
During port state control, it is common to see attention on:
-
The incinerator’s type approval certificate and identification
-
Operating procedures and crew competence
-
Evidence of compliant operation (records, timing, and location)
-
Waste segregation arrangements
-
Signs of illegal incineration (ash characteristics, residues, statements, or inconsistent logs)
Recordkeeping: the compliance “story” your ship tells
Even when ships operate correctly, weak recordkeeping creates risk. Incineration is connected to multiple record systems: garbage record books (as applicable), oily residue handling records, maintenance logs, and sometimes emissions-related checks depending on the ship’s compliance regime. A ship with excellent machinery but poor documentation is still vulnerable during inspections because regulators must rely on evidence.
Operational Safety: Why Incinerators Are Treated as Fire-Risk Equipment
Incinerators operate with high temperatures, forced draft fans, burners, ignition systems, and combustible waste feed. The risk picture typically includes backfire or flame instability during ignition, overheating from poor cooling or refractory damage, oil leaks in sludge burning systems, hot ash handling and re-ignition, and ventilation errors causing poor combustion and smoke backflow.
A SOLAS-aligned fire safety philosophy supports a systems approach to machinery space fire risk: detect early, limit fire growth, provide effective extinguishing arrangements, and ensure crew can respond safely. This is why many companies treat incinerator operations as permit-like activities, with clear watchkeeping expectations and a disciplined pre-start checklist.
Key Developments, Standards, and “What Good Looks Like” Onboard
The 2014 Standard Specification and its practical meaning
MEPC.244(66) is not just paperwork. It defines expectations that affect design and operation—combustion performance, testing, certification, and the framework administrations use to issue approval certificates. A well-run ship ensures that the operating manual and the installed incinerator configuration match the approval basis, and that crew are trained to operate within that envelope.
Port state control as an operational reality
Even if a ship aims to comply, the enforcement lens matters. Inspectors often look for clarity and consistency: certificates that match the installed unit, waste segregation that makes sense physically onboard, and records that tell a believable story. The simplest way to reduce risk is to operate in a way that is easy to demonstrate: clear procedures, predictable routines, and disciplined documentation.
Challenges and Practical Solutions
A shipboard incinerator is most effective when it is treated as part of a system rather than a standalone machine. In practice, failures tend to come from predictable pressure points: poor segregation, time pressure, misunderstanding of what is prohibited, inadequate maintenance, and inconsistent supervision.
One common challenge is operational overload. When port rotations are tight, crews may see the incinerator as a quick solution for “getting rid of waste.” The practical solution is procedural: clear segregation rules, simple signage at waste collection points, and a routine schedule for incineration that matches watchkeeping realities. When crews know exactly what can be burned, when it can be burned, and how it must be recorded, compliance becomes easier than non-compliance.
Another challenge is the “grey zone” around plastics. The solution is to remove ambiguity. The ship’s procedures should state plainly that plastics are generally not to be incinerated unless the incinerator’s certification scope and company policy explicitly permit specific plastics under controlled conditions. This should be reinforced by toolbox talks and audits, because illegal plastic incineration is a consistent enforcement focus.
A third challenge is equipment condition. Incinerators are exposed to harsh thermal cycling. Refractory linings degrade; burners foul; fans and dampers drift out of tune. A practical solution is to treat the incinerator like other combustion-critical equipment: planned maintenance tied to measurable indicators (combustion quality, refractory condition, burner performance, and alarm history), and clear criteria for when the unit should be taken out of service until rectified.
Case Studies and Real-World Applications
On many bulk carriers and general cargo ships, the incinerator’s primary operational role is sludge reduction. Consider a vessel trading long-haul routes with limited access to port reception facilities or high disposal fees. Sludge tanks can fill quickly, especially when fuel quality is variable or purifier loads increase. In this context, a well-maintained incinerator becomes a stability tool for engine-room waste management. The crew can plan incineration cycles during sea passages, avoid port/harbour restrictions for certain incineration pathways, and maintain adequate tank margins.
In contrast, on vessels with frequent port calls—such as feeder container ships—operators may rely more heavily on port reception facilities, using the incinerator selectively to manage specific wastes that are allowed and operationally sensible. Here the incinerator supports hygiene and storage management, but it is not the only end point for waste.
A third scenario is the vessel preparing for a concentrated inspection regime. In these cases, the incinerator often becomes a focus during pre-arrival checks: confirming certificates are onboard, verifying that the operating manual matches the installed unit, ensuring waste segregation stations are clearly labelled, and reviewing records for consistency. This is not bureaucracy for its own sake; it is a risk-control approach aligned with how inspections actually occur.
Future Outlook and Maritime Trends
Shipboard incineration is being reshaped by three converging trends.
First, environmental expectations continue to tighten. Flag states and port state control regimes increasingly expect clear evidence that ships manage waste without illegal incineration, particularly for plastics and prohibited substances. As guidance and standards evolve, ship operators will need more structured training and audits around “what is burnable” and “what is never burnable.”
Second, digital compliance is accelerating. More companies are moving from paper-only recordkeeping to integrated digital waste management workflows, tying incinerator operation to planned maintenance systems and compliance dashboards. This can reduce human error gaps, but only if crews are trained and the digital system matches reality onboard.
Third, alternative waste strategies may reduce reliance on incineration in some segments. Improved port reception facilities, stronger circular-economy pressures in shipping supply chains (less disposable packaging, better onboard segregation), and stricter company ESG policies can shift waste handling toward landing waste ashore rather than burning it at sea. Incinerators will still exist, but their role may become more controlled and documented rather than routine.
FAQ
1) Are shipboard incinerators required by SOLAS or IMO rules?
Incinerators are not universally required on all ships, but shipboard incineration is regulated. If an incinerator is fitted and used, it must comply with MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 16 and relevant type approval standards.
2) What is the main IMO rule for shipboard incineration?
The key instrument is MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 16 (Shipboard Incineration), which defines prohibitions, permitted incineration pathways, and type approval requirements.
3) Can ships incinerate PVC?
PVC incineration is generally prohibited, except in shipboard incinerators with the appropriate IMO type approval certificate issued under the relevant standards.
4) Can ships burn sludge oil and sewage sludge?
Regulation 16 recognizes that sludge oil and sewage sludge generated during normal operations may be incinerated under controlled conditions, including potential incineration in main/auxiliary plants or boilers with location restrictions for those cases.
5) What is MEPC.244(66)?
MEPC.244(66) is the IMO resolution containing the 2014 Standard Specification for Shipboard Incinerators, forming the basis for testing, certification, and type approval.
6) Why do port state control inspectors care about incinerators?
Because illegal incineration (especially prohibited substances like certain plastics or contaminated residues) is a serious environmental violation, and inspectors look for clear evidence of compliant operation and documentation.
7) Does SOLAS apply directly to incinerator operations?
SOLAS is not the main “what can be burned” instrument, but SOLAS fire safety principles shape how incinerators are arranged and managed as combustion equipment with fire risk potential.
Conclusion and Take-away
A shipboard incinerator is best understood as a compliance-critical tool, not a convenience device. Its legality is anchored in MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 16 and the IMO’s Standard Specification for Shipboard Incinerators (MEPC.244(66)), including type approval and clear prohibitions. At the same time, incinerator use must be aligned with a ship’s fire safety philosophy: controlled combustion, disciplined procedures, competent operators, and reliable records.
For maritime students and professionals, the practical takeaway is simple: the safest and most compliant incinerator operation is built on three pillars—segregate correctly, operate within certificate and procedure limits, and record consistently. If your platform covers onboard environmental management, engine-room operations, or port state control readiness, incinerators are a high-value topic because they connect everyday shipboard reality with the regulatory frameworks that define professional seamanship in modern shipping.
References (Hyperlinked)
-
International Maritime Organization (IMO). MARPOL Annex VI (Air Pollution) and shipboard incineration guidance: https://www.imo.org
-
IMO Resolution MEPC.244(66). 2014 Standard Specification for Shipboard Incinerators (available via IMO/MEPC documentation): https://www.imo.org
-
Paris Memorandum of Understanding (Paris MoU). MARPOL Annex VI inspection guidance (incineration checks referenced): https://www.parismou.org
-
SOLAS and the Fire Safety Systems (FSS) Code background (IMO): https://www.imo.org
-
MARPOL Annex V (Garbage) framework and shipboard waste management context (IMO): https://www.imo.org